Disposed

P. Vijayakumar v. the Director and Appellate Authority through Registrar and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC19 Dec 2019WP/118/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding compulsory retirement and appeal dismissal against Tata Institute of Social Sciences settled by consent. Petitioner to offer voluntary retirement; authorities to pass corresponding order and process dues.

What did the court decide?

Voluntary retirement order to be passed effective 19.8.2019; dues disbursed within two months; residential premises to be vacated by 29.2.2020.

P. Vijayakumar Vs the Director and Appellate… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

918-WPL-2424.2019.doc

¶2

suresh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION {LODGING} NO.2424 OF 2019

¶4

Dr. P. Vijayakumar .... Petitioner Vs. The Director & Appellate Authority Tata Institute of Social Sciences & Others .... Respondents

¶5

Ms Jai Kanade with Ms Shruti Tulpule & Mr. Rahul Shirgavkar i/by Ms Shruti Tulpule for the Petitioner. Mr. V.K. Wasnik for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. M.P. Balamurugan, Acting Registrar, TISS, present.

¶6

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.

¶7

DATE : DECEMBER 19, 2019

¶8

P.C:

¶9

After this writ petition was argued for some time, both sides have agreed to it being disposed of by the following order:-

¶10

(a) The order impugned in this petition, dated 19-8-2019, stands withdrawn.

¶11

(b) That order, copy of which is annexed to the petition as Exhibit “JJ-3” is passed by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences ( “TISS” ). The operative part of that order reads as under:-

¶12

Page 1 of 4

¶13

918-WPL-2424.2019.doc

¶14

suresh

¶15

“11. For the reasons and discussions aforesaid, I order that Prof. P Vijayakumar be compulsorily retired from services with immediate effect, however, with a condition that he would be entitiled to all retiral benefits.

¶16

12. Prof. Vijayakumar shall also vacate his residential accommodation within a period of four months from the date of this order.

¶17

13. This order shall be served on Prof. P Vijayakumar and shall be effective with immediate effect.

¶18

14. This order is appealable to the Appellate Authority, if Prof. P Vijayakumar so desires.”

¶19

(c) The petitioner says that there is also an order passed by the Appellate Authority and that order, copy of which is at page 271 of the paper-book, dismisses his Appeal. The Appeal, dated 11-4-2019 against the inquiry report dated 11-3-2019 of the Internal Complaint Committee, is the subject-matter of the Appeal which has been dismissed on 14-8-2019. Needless to clarify that post dismissal of this Appeal, the order of punishment is passed and the punishment imposed thereunder. If that order imposing punishment is withdrawn and does not survive, we do not see how the inquiry report, the recommendation therein and the Appeal against that recommendation would survive.

¶20

(d) Now the petitioner will tender, as agreed between the parties, an application seeking voluntary retirement from

¶21

Page 2 of 4

¶22

suresh

¶23

918-WPL-2424.2019.doc

¶24

the services of TISS. He will make that application latest by 26-12-2019.

¶25

(e) On that application being made by him, the Competent Authority shall pass the order of voluntary retirement from the services of the TISS, effective from 19-8-2019.

¶26

(f) The communication to that effect will be issued within eight (8) days from the date of receipt of the application by the petitioner.

¶27

(g) The amounts due and payable to the petitioner by the TISS shall be paid and disbursed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the communication from the TISS.

¶28

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶29

Since both sides have agreed to the above arrangement and disposal of the writ petition in this manner, no reasons are assigned by the Court for disposal of the writ petition.

¶30

The petitioner shall vacate the residential premises,

¶31

Page 3 of 4

¶32

suresh

¶33

918-WPL-2424.2019.doc

¶34

allotted to him by the TISS, latest by 29-2-2020. There will be no order as to costs.

¶35

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶36

Digitally signed SURESH by SURESH JAGDISH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT Date: 2019.12.21 SAJNAWAT 19:20:25 +0530

¶37

Page 4 of 4

P. Vijayakumar v. the Director and Appellate Authority through Registrar and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Vijayakumar v. the Director and Appellate Authority through Registrar and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

All Services Global Pvt.Ltd. Vs Union of India, through Chairman Railway Board and 2 Ors.

All Service Global Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.

Sudheer Kumar Lakavath and 17 Ors. Vs National Board of Examination Medical Enclave and 6 Ors.

Suresh Pandurang Patil Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Detp. of Education and Ors.

Sau. Sushila Ramchandra Karvande Vs the Chairma, the Jain Oswal Bldg.

Suresh Pandurang Patil Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Detp. of Education and Ors.