This review application was rejected by the Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench. The judge found no error apparent on the face of the record to warrant a reconsideration of the impugned writ petition decision.
Application for review is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCA107-20
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 107/2020
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3004/2019(D)
(RAMESH DHONDBAJI NAGDEVEVERSUS SAROJ ANIL MATE & ANOTHER)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Amol Mardikar, counsel for applicant.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR J.
DATE :FEBRUARY 07, 2020
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and
perused the application for review.
The attempt on the part of the learned counsel for the
applicant is to re-consider the matter to enable a different view
being taken from the one which was taken while deciding the
aforesaid writ petition.
On perusing the material on record, I do not find any
error apparent on the face of record to invoke review jurisdiction.
The application is thus rejected.
( A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. )
APTE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record to invoke review jurisdiction.
RAMESH DHONDBAJI NAGDEVE
SAROJ ANIL MATE
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court