Disposed

Bhagwan Haribhau Ingle v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing and Textiles Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC17 Jan 2020CAW/3225/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a civil application arising from a writ petition. The High Court, noting the absence of a reply from respondents, disposed of the matter by stating that the applicant's contention regarding departmental approval requirements is kept open for adjudication before the Director of Marketing.

What did the court decide?

The contention regarding approval requirements is kept open for adjudication by the Director of Marketing; Civil Application disposed.

Bhagwan Haribhau Ingle Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

2-CAW-3225-19

¶2

1/1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.3225 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5752 OF 2018 (D)

¶5

Bhagwan Haribhau Ingle, Secretary, APMC, Washim Tal. And Dist. Washim

¶6

-vs-

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing and Textiles Dept.
Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.

¶8

Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶9

Court's or Judge's Orders.

¶10

Shri M. V. Samarth, Advocate for applicant.

¶11

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.
 DATE : January 17, 2020

¶12

Though time was granted on 20/12/2019 to the respondent
Nos.1 to 3 to file reply, no reply has been filed on record.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the
judgment dated 18/10/2019.

¶14

It is clarified that the contention as raised that grant of
approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Assistant Secretary
on 18/11/2009 by the Director of Marketing does not require his
further appointment as Secretary of the Market Committee to be
approved by the Director of Marketing is kept open for being
adjudicated by the Director of Marketing in terms of the judgment
dated 18/10/2019. The points in that regard raised in the writ
petition are kept open and they can be urged before the Director of
Marketing when he considers the proposal afresh. With these
observations the Civil Application is disposed of.

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

Asmita

Bhagwan Haribhau Ingle v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing and Textiles Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Haribhau Ingle v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing and Textiles Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Nana S/O Falgunarao Patole and Another Vs Nitin S/O Jairam Gadkari

Balkrishna S/O Mahadeo Gharat Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Mumbai Thr. Senior Employees Relation Manager

Ordnance Factory Kamgar Union, Bhusawal Thr. President Shri. Rajendra Jha Vs the Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Nagpur and Others

Shri Suhas Balaji Yerawar Vs Shri Arun S/O Keshavrao Yerawar and Another

Mr. Aftab Khan Jalil Khan Vs Municipal Council, through Its Chief Officer, Wardha

Ramesh S/O Dhondbaji Nagdeve Vs Sau. Saroj W/O Anil Mate and Another