Allowed

Mohammad Zafar Abul Rashid v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC22 Jan 2020CAW/177/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a Civil Application for amendment within one week. It also directed the issuance of notice for final disposal regarding a violation of natural justice in an education officer's enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application for amendment allowed to be carried out within one week; notice issued for final disposal of matter.

Mohammad Zafar Abul Rashid Vs State of Maharashtra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CAW No.177/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 2020

¶4

Mohammad Zafar Abdul Rashid

¶5

vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra and ors.

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

Ms. Kirti Satpute, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶10

 AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED: 22.01.2020.

¶11

Civil Application for amendment is allowed.
2.Necessary amendment be carried out within a
period of one week.

¶12

Writ Petition No.448/2020

¶13

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

¶14

petitioner.

¶15

4.Enquiry is conducted by the Education Officer
through a Committee of 3-Members. A copy of report is not
supplied to the petitioner and hence, there is violation of
principles of natural justice in taking action against the
petitioner for imposing liability of Rs.1,71,161/- for the
alleged illegal appointments. Hence, issue notice for final
disposal of the matter to the respondents, returnable on

¶16

¶17

18.03.2020 .

¶18

5.Ms. N.P. Mehta, learned Assistant
Government Pleader waives service of notice for
respondent no.1.

¶19

JUDGE JUDGE

¶20

Ambulkar

Mohammad Zafar Abul Rashid v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Zafar Abul Rashid v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitin Vitthalrao Datir and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Daud Khan S/O Azam Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, School Education and Sports, Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Mrs. Tilottama W/O Sanjay Kinkhede Vs the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur

Urmila W/O Wasudeo Kowe Vs the Union of India, Ministry of External Affairs, through Secretary and Others

Bhabhuti Ramprit Prasad Vs Western Coal Field Limited, Nagpur and Another

Jaiswant S/O Bapurao Khadse, Akola Vs the Secty., Shivaji Edun. Socity, Amravati and 6 Otrs