Disposed

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its Partner Shri. Nandkishor R. Rajput, Buldhana v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur

Bombay HC10 Jan 2020CAT/6/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, permitted the appellant to withdraw the pending Central Excise Appeal to avail the benefits of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme 2019, and disposed of related pending civil applications.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeal to avail benefits of the Sabka Vishwas Scheme permitted. Appeal and connected civil applications disposed of.

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its… — Banking and Recovery | Bombay HC (2020)

¶1

1 4.CAT6.2019.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.01/2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6/2019 IN

¶4

CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (ST.) NO.28722/2018

¶5

J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur.

¶6

…........................................................................................................................................
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order
of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

........................................................................................................................................…...
Shri A. J. Bhoot, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri S. N. Bhattad, Advocate for the respondent.

¶8

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &

¶9

A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : 10^th JANUARY, 2020.

¶10

.The appellant seeks permission to withdraw
this Appeal in view of Section 127(7) of the Sabka Vishwas
(Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019 in order to avail
benefit of the said scheme.

¶11

2.Hence, we permit the appellant to withdraw
this Appeal.

¶12

3.Central Excise Appeal (St.) No.28722 of 2018
stands disposed of, as withdrawn.

¶13

4.Since the Appeal is disposed of, pending Civil
Application Nos.6 of 2019 and 7 of 2019 do not survive.
Hence, those applications stand disposed of accordingly.

¶14

JUDGEJUDGE

¶15

RGurnule

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its Partner Shri. Nandkishor R. Rajput, Buldhana v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its Partner Shri. Nandkishor R. Rajput, Buldhana v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Antaram S/O Tanuji Pada Vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli and Another

Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur through Director Shri Ashwin Shah Vs Union of India and Others

Dr. (Smt.) Prabha S. Nichkawade, Nagpur Vs the Chairman Um M.D. M/S W.C.L. Nagpur and 3 Otrs

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its Partner Shri. Nandkishor R. Rajput, Buldhana Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its Partner Shri. Nandkishor R. Rajput, Buldhana Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur

M/S J.V. Kulkarni and Friends Associates through Its Partner Shri. Nandkishor R. Rajput, Buldhana Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur