The High Court ordered the unconditional withdrawal of the bail application. The applicant prayed for expedited trial, which the single judge granted.
Unconditional withdrawal of the bail application; trial expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-BA-3408-18.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3408 OF 2018
Sumit Yeshwant Lanke.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr..... Respondents
Dr. Uday Prakash Warunjikar for Applicant.
Mr. Shashikant D. Chandak i/b. Legal Aid for Orig.Complainant.
Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 21st OCTOBER, 2020.
P.C. :
1.After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in this application, learned counsel for
the Applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
application. His limited submission is that the trial be expedited.
2.Prayer is accepted. The application is allowed to be
withdrawn unconditionally on merits. However, considering the
young age of the Applicant, the trial is expedited.
Digitally signed by PradeepkumarP. Deshmane PradeepkumarP. DeshmaneDate: 2020.10.22 16:52:58 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 of 1
Deshmane (PS)
Sumit Yeshwant Lanke
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court