The applicant prayed for withdrawal of his anticipatory bail application. The Single Judge permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the application, retaining jurisdiction over any future bail application.
Permission granted to withdraw the application unconditionally; application disposed of. Future bail to be decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
41-ABA-ST-2887-20.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.2887 OF 2020
Aslam Jalil Ahmed Shaikh.... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr.Rohit Sawant, Advocate for Applicant.Mr.R.M. Pethe, APP for the State/Respondent.Ms.Deepal Thakkar, Advocate for first informant.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 16th OCTOBER, 2020
P.C. :
1. After arguing for some time, when I expressed my disinclination to grant relief, the learned counsel for the Applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this application.
2. Permission granted. Application is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of as such.
3. If any application for bail is filed in future, it shall be decided on its own merits without being influenced by this order of withdrawal.
Digitally signed by Pradeepkumar Pradeepkumar P. Deshmane P. Deshmane Date: 2020.10.17 13:23:37 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Aslam Jalil Ahmed Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court