Dyanoba Vitthal Jagtap and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR. APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2020
Dyanoba Vitthal Jagtap And Anr ....Appellant V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Respondent
....Respondent
Mr Kuldeep Patil i/b Mr Prashant Subhash Hagare For Appellant Mrs M.H. Mhatre APP for State Mr Ranjeet Madhukar Pawar for Respondent No.2
Ms Aishwarya Sharma, A.S.P. Daund, District Pune Present.
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ KESHAVRAO CHAVAN, J DATE : 24th February, 2020
P.C. :
Arguments are concluded. Judgment is reserved.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dyanoba Vitthal Jagtap And Anr
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
Coram
PRITHVIRAJ KESHAVRAO CHAVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court