Sambhaji Ramdas Girhe v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The applicant alleged false implication and a consensual relationship. The Court held the matter serious, noted insufficient proof of a long-standing consensual relation, and refused bail to avoid prejudice to the ongoing investigation into alleged rape.
What the court decided
932.ABA.970.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.970 OF 2020
Sambhaji s/o Ramdas Girhe, Age : 30 years, Occu: Agri., R/o : Ambe Gavhan, Rohokadi Pune, Junnar – 412 409.
… Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra, through Police Inspector, Police Station Ghargaon, District Ahmednagar.
… Respondent
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Salunke i/b. Mr. M.V. Salunke APP for Respondent/State: Mr. M.V. Kagne
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 06.11.2020
PER COURT :
The applicant is seeking bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.180/2020 registered with Ghargaon Police Station, Tq. Sangamner, District Ahmednagar.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves to be granted anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with a rape charge.
Whether the็ก有点儿 delay in lodging the FIR warrants granting anticipatory bail.
Whether the allegations of false implication and consensual relationship justify releasing the applicant on bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sambhaji s/o Ramdas Girhe
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra, through Police Inspector, Police Station Ghargaon
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court