The applicant sought leave to withdraw an anticipatory bail application after the court expressed disinclination to grant bail on merits. The court granted leave and disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923 aba 894 20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
923 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.894 OF 2020
JIJABRAO NAMDEO SADARAO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D.M. Pingale
APP for Respondent : G.L. Deshpande.
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE:06/11/2020
PER COURT :
After hearing the arguments when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant anticipatory bail on merits, the learned advocate for
the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2. Leave is granted.
3. The Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
mkd
1/1
Jijabrao Namdeo Sadarao
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court