Anticipatory bail application was withdrawn by the applicant upon the court expressing disinclination to grant relief. The application was disposed of accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application granted; application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
6ABA815.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
6 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 815 OF 2020
KAILASH S/O. TUKARAM DHADI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.B. Bhapkar h/f. Mr. P.B. Rakhunde.
APP for Respondent : Mrs. P.V. Diggikar.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE :24.11.2020
Per Court :
After having heard both the sides when this Court expressed its
disinclination to grant anticipatory bail, learned Advocate for the applicant, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2. Leave is granted. Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
S.P.C.
KAILASH S/O. TUKARAM DHADI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court