The Court permitted the unconditionally withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application by the applicant. The matter was disposed of accordingly without granting the substantive relief sought.
Permission granted for unconditional withdrawal of the application; matter disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-aba-st-2514-20.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 2514 OF 2020
Rakesh Vinayak Prasade.... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Sameer K. Sawant, for the Applicant.
Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 14th OCTOBER, 2020
P.C. :
1.After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in this application, learned counsel for
the Applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
application.
2. Permission is granted. The application is allowed to be
withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Digitally signed by Pradeepkumar Pradeepkumar P. Deshmane P. Deshmane Date: 2020.10.15 14:47:19 +0530
1 of 1
Deshmane (PS)
Rakesh Vinayak Prasade
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court