The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, dismissed Writ Petition No. 966 of 2000 as infructuous due to an earlier order dated 17-1-2019 in P.I.L. No. 71 of 2015. The court kept questions regarding the new Act's applicability open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2401wp966.00.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.966 of 2000 Dr. Rekharani w/o Dr. Ranjan Bhiwapurkar Versus The State of Maharashtra, through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri H.D. Dangre, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for Applicant-Intervenor in CAW No.217 of 2019.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 24th January, 2019
The petition has become infructuous in view of the order
dated 17-1-2019 passed by this Court in P.I.L. No.71 of 2015.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
All questions regarding the applicability of the new Act are
kept open.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar
Dr. Rekharani w/o Dr. Ranjan Bhiwapurkar
The State of Maharashtra
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
