The Bench dismissed a writ petition seeking redressal through departmental authorities, holding there was no reason to interfere. All questions were left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2501wp651.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.651 of 2019 Mirza Zafar Baig Mirza Akhtar Baig Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, and another.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri S.Y. Deopujari, Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 25th January, 2019
The petitioner is at liberty to the redressal of his grievance done through the departmental authorities and we do not find any reason to interfere in this petition.
The petition is dismissed. All questions are left open.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar
Mirza Zafar Baig Mirza Akhtar Baig
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai
another
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
