Petitioners requested withdrawal of both writ petitions via written communication. The High Court accepted the request and dismissed both writ petitions accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp934619.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9346 OF 2019
M/s Bhaskara Agencies
Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & others
Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.9353 OF 2019
M/s Renuka Gas Service
Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & others
Respondents
Mr.V.V.Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.B.Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General of India (ASGI) for Respondent No.1.
Mr.A.P.Bhandari, advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 03rd October, 2019
PER COURT:
1 Learned Counsel for the petitioners invited our
attention to the separate communications dated 26.09.2019 and submitted that by the said written communications, the petitioners
have requested the Counsel to withdraw both the petitions. The communications are taken on record and marked “X” for
wp934619.odt
identification.
2 In view of the submission of the learned Counsel for
the petitioner as well the written communications marked as “X” for identification, both the petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
AVINASH G. GHAROTE JUDGE
PRASANNA B. VARALE JUDGE
adb/
M/s Bhaskara Agencies & M/s Renuka Gas Service
Union of India & others
Prasanna B. Varale
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
