A High Court of Maharashtra bench allowed the withdrawal of a contempt petition arising from a Public Interest Litigation without further considerations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
664.19cp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITIOIN NO.664 OF 2019 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.67 OF 2017
Govind s/o Keshavrao Nikam
Age: 60 years, Occ: Agri.,
R/o. Wasadi, Tq. Kannad
Dist. Aurangabad & anr
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Shri. Uday Chaudhari
Age: Major, Occ: Service as Collector,
R/o. Office of Collector,
Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad
RESPONDENT
Mr T.M. Venjane, Advocate for the petitioners;
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATED :1st OCTOBER, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners,
on instructions, prays for withdrawal of the petition.
( 2 ) 664.19cp
2.The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and
disposed of accordingly.
[AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
Tupe
Govind s/o Keshavrao Nikam
Shri. Uday Chaudhari
PRASANNA B. VARALE
AVINASH G. GHAROTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court