Petitioners withdrew their writ petitions challenging policies of the Union of India and Oil Distribution Company with liberty to move appropriate judicial forums if aggrieved.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before competent judicial forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
937 WRIT PETITION NO.8423 OF 2019
RAMAI GAS SERVICE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SUNITA PUNDLIK GAJBHARE
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9156 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9565 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9656 OF 2019
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Dixit Sushant V. Advocate for Respondent No. : Mr S. B. Deshpande, ASG Advocate for Respondents 2 & 3: Mr. A.P. Bhandari
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 18th December, 2019
ORDER :
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
JPC
RAMAI GAS SERVICE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SUNITA PUNDLIK GAJBHARE
THE UNION OF INDIA
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
