Petitioner counsel stated the writ petition had become infructuous. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
None granted; the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0411wp8208.17.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.8208/2017
Shobha d/o Laxmanrao Pawar
...Versus...
Adhyapak Vidyamandal, Indira Nagar, Tumsar, District : Bhandara, through its Head Master and others
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - -
Shri R.M. Ahirrao, Counsel for petitioner
Shri A.A. Madiwale, AGP for respondent nos.3 and 4
CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE: 04/11/2019
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that
the matter has become infructuous.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such.
No order as to costs.
(Milind N. Jadhav, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Wadkar, P.S.
Shobha d/o Laxmanrao Pawar
Adhyapak Vidyamandal, Indira Nagar, Tumsar, District : Bhandara
R. K. Deshpande
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court