Disposed

M.S.R.T.C. Employees Co-Op. Society Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Authorised Person Shri Jaiprakash S. Ganjre v. Maharashtra State Road Transprot Corporation Thr. Managing Director, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC4 Nov 2019WP/8194/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn after a subsequent policy decision by the respondent corporation rendered the petitioner's grievance inoperative.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

What the court decided

M.S.R.T.C. Employees Co-Op. Society Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Authorised Person Shri Jaiprakash S. Ganjre Vs Maharashtra State Road Transprot Corporation Thr. Managing Director, Mumbai and Others — Bombay HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

0411wp8194.17.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.8194/2017

¶5

M.S.R.T.C. Employees Cooperative Society Ltd. Nagpur through its Authorised Person Shri Jai Prakash Shyamao Ganjre

¶6

...Versus...

¶7

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation through its Managing Director, Central Office, Mumbai and others

¶8

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - -
Shri P.S. Tidke, Counsel for petitioner
Shri A.D. Sonak, Counsel for respondent no.3

¶11

CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 04/11/2019

¶12

In view of the subsequent policy decision of the
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, dated 08th/9th
February, 2018 the grievance of the petitioner does not
survive.

¶13

The petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to
withdraw the present petition.

¶14

Permission to withdraw the writ petition is
granted.

¶15

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.

¶16

 (Milind N. Jadhav, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)

¶17

Wadkar, P.S.

M.S.R.T.C. Employees Co-Op. Society Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Authorised Person Shri Jaiprakash S. Ganjre v. Maharashtra State Road Transprot Corporation Thr. Managing Director, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

M.S.R.T.C. Employees Co-Op. Society Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Authorised Person Shri Jaiprakash S. Ganjre v. Maharashtra State Road Transprot Corporation Thr. Managing Director, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra S/O Mahadeorao Khutate Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Ministry of Transport, Mumbai and 3 Others

Vasudeo S/O Anandrao Zamre Vs Ramrao Gopalrao Zanak Education Society, Thr. President and Others

Shobha D/O Laxmanrao Pawar Vs Adhyapak Vidyamandal, Throuth Its Head Master, Tumsar and 3 Othrs