Disposed

Madhavrao Raosaheb Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC5 Sept 2019WP/7509/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order addresses a writ petition challenging the seizure of the petitioner's vehicle for alleged illegal sand transportation. The High Court ordered the release of the vehicle subject to producing ownership documents, executing a bond, and depositing Rs. 50,000 pending the appeal outcome.

What did the court decide?

Release of the seized vehicle upon verification of ownership, execution of a bond, and deposit of Rs. 50,000 pending appeal.

Madhavrao Raosaheb Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

1 wp 7509.19

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 7509 OF 2019

¶4

Madhavrao Raosaheb Koli .. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

¶7

Shri G. N. Kulkarni, Advocate Shri Vinod S. Khairnar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Nanoade, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

¶8

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 05TH SEPTEMBER, 2019.

¶9

FINAL ORDER :

¶10

. The vehicle of the petitioner is seized on the ground of illegal transportation of sand. Fine and penalty is also imposed upon the petitioner.

¶11

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the vehicle is seized by the Circle Officer. He has no authority under the M. L. R. Code to seize the vehicle. Whereas, according to the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the vehicle is seized under the orders of the Sub Divisional Officer. The fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lac only) is imposed upon the vehicle. So also penalty is imposed for illegal excavation and transportation

¶12

2 wp 7509.19

¶13

of sand. As it is seized by the Circle Officer, same is without jurisdiction.

¶14

As far as fine and penalty is concerned, the petitioner has got remedy of appeal. The petitioner may avail the remedy. Present petition is restricted to the extent of release of vehicle.

¶15

In the light of the above, we pass following order.

¶16

The respondents shall release the vehicle seized under the panchanama dated 31.03.2019 after verifying the documents of ownership of the petitioner. The respondents are entitled to get the bond executed from the petitioner to their satisfaction. The petitioner shall also deposit an amount of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty thousands only) with the respondents. The said deposit shall be subject to the decision that would be given by the appellate authority in case the petitioner files an appeal.

¶17

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶18

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶19

bsb/Sept. 19

Madhavrao Raosaheb Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhavrao Raosaheb Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhule Education Society Dhule through Its Secretary Santosh Subhashchandra Agrawal and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shaikh Mehboob Shaikh Hasan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vaibhavi Tulshiram Darlawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kirankumar Reddy Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Goraj Cotspin Pvt. Ltd. Beed and Others Vs the Union of India and Others

Rangrao Maroti Shinde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others