Petitioner challenged non-supply of documents triggering a charge-sheet. Respondent communicated that documents are available for collection. Petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its disposition as withdrawn.
None; Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-wp-6608-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6608 OF 2019
Ganesh Marotrao Chaudhari ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra Through the Chief Secretary & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Ajit J. Kenjale for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.A. Alaspurkar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 05th JULY 2019
P.C.
2, The learned AGP has tendered before us a communication dated 27.06.2019, addressed to the petitioner wherein the Deputy Secretary of the Department has informed the petitioner that the documents sought by him are made available and
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2
he is directed to collect the said documents by personally remaining present in the Mantralaya. The communication is taken on record.
(SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's complaint regarding non-supply of charge-sheet documents is valid in view of subsequent communication making documents available for collection.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganesh Marotrao Chaudhari
The State of Maharashtra Through the Chief Secretary
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
