Core content of the judgment is missing; only a procedural disposal is available. With liberty to present the matter before the Aurangabad Bench, the challenge is disposed of. No legal principle or detailed reasoning is provided in the available text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
3-WP-653-18.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.653 OF 2018
Varsha Ganesh Soppa
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Ms. Sneha Shinde for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 01/03/2019.
P.C.:
. With liberty to the petitioner to present the matter before the Aurangabad Bench of this Court with same prayers, we dispose of the present challenge.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the order is maintainable.
Varsha Ganesh Soppa
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dhar马达希卡里
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
