Special Bench quashed an FIR under various IPC provisions at the joint request of the husband and wife, noting their pending mutual consent proceedings under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Rule made absolute to quash the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 504, 506(2), 323, and 34 of IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-wp-188.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 188 OF 2019
Paresh Waman Gaikwad and Ors. . … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr.Quintin D'Souza for the Petitioners.
Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the respondent State.
Mr. Pranot Pawar i/by Pawar & Co. for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : MARCH 01, 2019
P.C. :
Petitioner no.1 husband and respondent no. 3 wife are jointly requesting for quashing of the FIR which is under sections 498A 406, 504, 506(2) 323 and 34 of IPC.
record her no objection.
1/2
nilegaonkar
11-wp-188.2019.odt
agreed amount of Rs.3,50,000/-.
rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a),
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2/2
nilegaonkar
Paresh Waman Gaikwad and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
