Oral order disposing of a writ petition concerning land area reduction under a consolidation scheme. The court directed the petitioner to avail permissible legal remedies and kept contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 904-WP-11408-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11408 OF 2019
BHAGWAN SANTOBA NANDURE
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Mr. B.G. Sagade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. A.B. Dhongade, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
in law.
[ ANIL S.KILOR ] [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE
mta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has a remedy under the Prevention of and Consolidation of Holdings Act regarding reduction in land area.
Bhagwan Santoba NANDURE
The Union of India
S.V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
