Petitioner, a prisoner in open prison, returned late from extended parole. The court reduced the punishment for delay from 4 days to 2 days cut in remission per day of delay, partly allowing the writ petition.
Punishment deduction of 82 days in remission reduced by modifying the order dated 20/8/2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-wp-6164.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6164 OF 2019
Chandradev Parmeshwar Rai
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
None for the petitioner.
Smt. Aruna Pai, APP for the State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2019
P.C. :
Heard learned APP for the State. She upon instructions states that the rejection order was passed on 16/11/2015. The prisoner has returned back late by 45 days and therefore, his request to treat the said period as an extended leave period cannot be accepted.
1/2
nilegaonkar
10-wp-6164.2019.odt
had sought any extension or then, whether it was rejected. The extension sanctioned on 16/11/2015 is for the period which expired on 28/08/2015.
(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2/2
nilegaonkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the punishment of deduction of remission for late return from extended leave be reduced.
Chandradev Parmeshwar Rai
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharadhikari
Nitin R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
