Petitioner sought direction for production during trial for overstaying on furlough. Court observed nominal roll showed release after prison term. Petition disposed with no substantive discussion.
Production order denied and petition disposed of as challenge based on nominal roll shows release.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-wp-1415.2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1415 OF 2016
Sandip Sudam Tirmali
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
None for the petitioner.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2019
P.C. :
Petitioner seeks a direction to produce him during the trial
of the case registered for overstaying during the furlough leave. Learned APP has produced nominal roll at Exh. A which shows that after completing prison term, he has been released from the prison. Hence, the said challenge does not survive. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.)
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1/1
nilegaonkar
Sandip Sudam Tirmali
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Nitin R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
