Disposed

Reshma Taheseen W/O Syed Muzaffar Ali v. Zilla Parishad, Akola through Chief Executive Officer and Another

Bombay HC27 Sept 2019WP/5874/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coram disposed of four connected writ petitions concerning pending representations. The court directed the respondent to decide representations within four weeks per Government Resolution and kept all questions open.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondent to decide representations within four weeks; all questions kept open.

Reshma Taheseen W/O Syed Muzaffar Ali Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

2709wp5873.19 & others

¶2

1/1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5873 OF 2019

¶5

 (Rajesh s/o Gulabrao Masne vs. Zilla Parishad, Akola and another)
 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5874 OF 2019

¶6

 (Reshma Taheseen w/o Syed Muzaffar Ali vs. Zilla Parishad, Akola and another)
 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5875 OF 2019

¶7

 (Kapil s/o Murlidhar Ingle vs. Zilla Parishad, Akola and another)
 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5876 OF 2019

¶8

 (Smt. Firoz Akhtar Ayyub Khan vs. Zilla Parishad, Akola and another)

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶10

Shri R.D. Karode, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri K.S. Malokar, Advocate for respondents.

¶11

 CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE AND
 VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
 DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2019

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶13

2)Shri Malokar, learned Counsel appearing
for respondents, makes a statement that within a
period of four weeks from today, representations of
petitioners shall be decided in accordance with the
policy laid down in the Government Resolution.

¶14

3)In view of above, writ petitions are
disposed of. All questions are kept open. No order
as to costs.

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

 JUDGE

¶17

khj

Reshma Taheseen W/O Syed Muzaffar Ali v. Zilla Parishad, Akola through Chief Executive Officer and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reshma Taheseen W/O Syed Muzaffar Ali v. Zilla Parishad, Akola through Chief Executive Officer and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kumar Agarwal Vs the Ministry of Environment and Forest, through Its Secretary, Govt. of India, New Delhi and Others

Shriram Balkrushna Patankar Vs the District Collector, Nagpur and Another

Courts on Its Own Motion Vs State of Maharashtra, in the Ministry of Revenue and Forest, through Its Secretary, Mumbai and Othe

Radheshyam S/O Shivaji Lanjewar Vs Municipal Council Tumsar, Bhandara through Its Chief Officer

Suresh S/O Natthuji Porbhare Vs Municipal Council Tumsar, Bhandara through Its Chief Officer

Rajesh S/O Gulabrao Masne Vs Zilla Parishad, through Its Chief Executive Officer, Akola and Another