A single-paragraph order dismissing a writ petition where the court held that the petitioner's grievance regarding the restoration of a water connection no longer survives.
Petition dismissed; no relief granted. Compensation claim to be pursued via appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2509wp3338.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3338 OF 2019
(Shri Shriram Balkrushna Patankar vs. The District Collector, Nagpur and
another)
________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri T. Parmar, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri A.M. Joshi, Assistant Government Pleader for
respondent no.1.
Shri A. Shelat, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE AND
VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 25, 2019
Water connection in the property of the
petitioner situated at Narkhed is restored. Hence,
grievance of the petitioner in the petition does not
survive. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.
If the petitioner wants to claim
compensation, he is at liberty to adopt appropriate
remedy.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Shri Shriram Balkrushna Patankar
The District Collector, Nagpur
another
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court