The court addressed a challenge to the framing of a charge alleging a forged letter was the basis. After verifying the letter's genuineness, the court declined to interfere with the trial at its advanced stage and disposed of the petition.
Petition dismissed; the letter dated 12.09.2017 is found genuine; no interference with the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.WP.528.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.528 OF 2018
Mr. Jaisingh Ramsurabh Mathur …..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent
Mr. N.S. Kasture, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2019.
P. C. :
AGP 1/2
11.WP.528.18.odt
[N.J. JAMADAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
AGP 2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the charge framed against the petitioner was based on a forged letter or genuine document.
Whether the writ petition ought to interfere with the trial which is at an advanced stage.
Mr. Jaisingh Ramsurabh Mathur
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
N.J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
