Disposed

Baliram Mahadu Patil v. State of Maharashtra through Rural Dev. Depto and Irrigation Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Aug 2019WP/2321/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this urgent writ petition, the High Court directed the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane, to decide a representation made by the Maharashtra State Grampanchayat Employees Union within six weeks. The court did not adjudicate merits, keeping the matter open for the concerned authority.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide the representation of the Grampanchayat Employees Union within six weeks and communicate the speaking order to the petitioner.

Baliram Mahadu Patil Vs State of Maharashtra through… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

514.2 wp 2321.19.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2321 of 2019

¶3

Baliram Mahadu Patil …..Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. …..Respondents

¶4

Mr. Kishor S. Patil i/b. Mr. A. P. Mhatre, advocate for the petitioner. Ms. R. M. Shinde, AGP for the State.

¶5

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : 26^th AUGUST, 2019.

¶6

P. C. :

¶7

Mentioned for production. Taken up on production board in view of urgency.

¶8

Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks leave to amend the petition, so as to annex the copy of representation dated 21^st August, 2018 made by Maharashtra State Grampanchayat Employees Union and to carry out consequential amendments as well. Leave as prayed for, is granted. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶9

Having heard Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, we deem it convenient to dispose of this petition by directing respondent No.3-Chief

¶10

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

¶11

514.2 wp 2321.19.doc

¶12

Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane, to decide the representation dated 21^st August, 2018 made by Maharashtra State Grampanchayat Employees Union, a copy of which is annexed at “Exhibit – I”, page 61 to the petition, as expeditiously as possible and, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Ordered accordingly.

¶13

It is made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matters and, all rights and contentions of the respective parties are kept expressly open to be agitated before the concerned authority. Respondent No.3Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane, shall decide the said representation by passing speaking order and, thereafter, shall communicate the same to the petitioner.

¶14

The petitioner shall remain present before respondent No.3-Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane, on 9^th September, 2019 at 11.00 a.m. along with the aforesaid representation as well as copy of this order in order to enable him to pass an appropriate order.

¶15

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶16

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶17

Shubhada S Kadam 2/2

Baliram Mahadu Patil v. State of Maharashtra through Rural Dev. Depto and Irrigation Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baliram Mahadu Patil v. State of Maharashtra through Rural Dev. Depto and Irrigation Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kanojia and Anr. Vs Minister of Co-Operative Societies Maharashtra State and 5 Ors.

Mrs. Vandana Vipul Mishra Vs the Union of India through Gp , Mumbai and Anr.

Kamlesh Ghanshyam Lohia and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sunita Sadanand Bhatate and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Gurunath Jayram Thorat Vs State of Maharashtra through Rural Dev. Depto and Irrigation Dept. and Ors.

Prakash Damodar Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra through Rural Dev. Depot and Irrigation Dept. and Ors.