Disposed

Seva Samiti C. H. S. Ltd. Thru Secretary Ashok R Kurkreja v. the State of Maharashtra Thru Addl. Gp and Anr.

Bombay HC8 Jan 2019WP/427/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Joint Registrar to adjudicate the pending revision application expeditiously and ensuring any appointments made pursuant to the disputed order remain subject to the revision's outcome.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Joint Registrar to dispose of Revision Application No. 485/2018 expeditiously within three months and subjecting any appointments made to the outcome of said revision.

Seva Samiti C. H. S. Ltd. Thru Secretary Ashok R… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

901 - WPST. 382-19

¶2

VPH

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION (St.) No. 382 OF 2019

¶5

Seva Samiti Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. through the Secretary – Mr. Ashok R. Kukreja … Petitioner Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

¶9

Mr. Satish R. Mishra, for the Petitioner.

¶10

Mrs. Sushma Bhende, APP for Respondent - State.

¶11

¶12

CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY, & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 8, 2019

¶13

PC :

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, as also the learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State. The present petition came to be filed challenging the order dated 31^st December, 2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2, in which it has been mentioned that a meeting has been scheduled for appointing the Chairman, Secretary and the Treasurer of the Seva Samiti CoOp. Housing Society Ltd.

¶15

The learned counsel for the Petitioner inter alia submitted that the Petitioner was a member of the earlier Managing Committee and was disqualified from being appointed as

¶16

1 / 3

¶17

901 - WPST. 382-19

¶18

the member of the Managing Committee for a further period of five years. This order dated dated 16.11.2018 itself disqualifying the Petitioner and the others is the subject matter of Revision Application No. 485 of 2018, pending before the Joint Registrar, Mumbai. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that if the process of appointment of the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer is carried out, then there is every likelihood that the revision application filed by him would be rendered infructuous. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that although the revision was filed by the Petitioner and the matter was listed on three earlier dates, due to preoccupation of the Jt. Registrar, the matter could not be taken up and now, the matter is listed on 28^th January, 2019 for consideration.

¶19

Without entering into merits of the claims made by the Petitioner, for the purpose of meeting the ends of justice, we dispose of this petition by passing the following order:

¶20

(i) If any appointment is made pursuant to the impugned order dated 31.12.2018 (Exhibit A to the petition), the same shall be subject to the outcome of Revision Application No. 485/2018 pending before the Jt. Registrar, Mumbai.

¶21

(ii) We direct the Jt. Registrar, Mumbai to take up and dispose of Revision Application No. 485/2018 pending

¶22

2 / 3

¶23

901 - WPST. 382-19

¶24

before him, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from today, if not earlier disposed of.

¶25

(iii) We make it clear that the Jt. Registrar, Mumbai shall proceed to adjudicate the above revision application on merits and strictly in accordance with law, without being influenced in any manner by any order that may be passed by the Registrar, pursuant to letter dated 31.12.2018 (Exhibit A to the petition).

¶26

(iv) Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

Sd/Sd/[SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.]

¶28

Vinayak Halemath

¶29

3 / 3

Seva Samiti C. H. S. Ltd. Thru Secretary Ashok R Kurkreja v. the State of Maharashtra Thru Addl. Gp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seva Samiti C. H. S. Ltd. Thru Secretary Ashok R Kurkreja v. the State of Maharashtra Thru Addl. Gp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Walmik Keda Sarode . Vs the State of Maharashtra .

Deepak Dalvirsingh Sisodiya Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dilip J. Choudhary Vs State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

State of Maharashtra Vs Alex @ Taklya Francis Dias and Ors.

Suvarna Ashok Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Suvarna Ashok Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.