the confession is not beyond suspicion. He invited our attention to the evidence of the Police Officer who had produced the present Applicant before the concerned authority for recording of his confession. He pointed out that the medical papers show that the medical examination of the Applicant was completed at about 6.25 p.m. on 03/08/2011 and thereafter the confessional statement was recorded after 6.45 p.m. However, the Police Officer (PW 106 - API Shinde) who had taken the Applicant to the concerned officer (PW 124 - DCP Dr.Dorje) for recording the confession, has deposed that the Applicant was taken for medical examination after his confessional statement was recorded. He submitted that this apparently contrary statement of the Police Officer shows that the confession was not actually recorded and it is a fabricated document. He further submitted that as per the rules made under the MCOC Act, the accused who had shown willingness to confess, was required to be given clear 24 hours period to reconsider his decision. In this case, according to learned Counsel Mr. Rathod, this compliance has not been made by the investigating agency and therefore, it creates further doubt about recording of the confession and it shows that it was not voluntarily made. He further submitted that the Applicant had his leg amputated
