The High Court held that the writ petition became infructuous in view of a petition status and permitted the petitioners to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
2509wp4206.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4206 OF 2019
(Vivekanand Polytechnic and another vs. The All India Council for Technical
Education and others)
________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri Abdul Subhan, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri N.P. Lambat, Advocate for respondent nos.1
and 2.
Shri P.R. Puri, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for
respondent no.4.
CORAM: R.K. DESHPANDE AND
VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 25, 2019
In view of Pursis St. No. 12211/2019, the
petition has become infructuous. The petitioners
are, therefore, permitted to withdraw this petition.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Vivekanand Polytechnic and another
The All India Council for Technical Education and others
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court