Partly allowed

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Anr.

Bombay HC12 Dec 2019WP/3911/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants ad-interim relief staying the execution of order reverting two petitioners from their posts, directing a reply from the state, and hearing these petitions along with a related writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Stayed execution of impugned orders reverting petitioners from their posts; directed respondents to file reply; heard petitions with WP No. 10416 of 2019.

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

wpst. 28553-19-nob.doc

¶2

DDR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION ST. NO. 28553 OF 2019

¶5

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire ..Petitioner

¶6

vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ..Respondents

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 10876 OF 2019

¶9

Vidya Pandurang Bhadane ..Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ..Respondents

¶10

Mr. P.S.Bhavake for petitioners. Mrs. M.P.Thakur, AGP for state.

¶11

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 14^th NOVEMBER, 2019

¶13

P.C.:-

¶14

Not on Board. Taken on Board.

¶15

The facts of the present Petitions and the facts of the Writ Petition No. 10416 of 2019 are similar in that the petitioners in both Petitions are reverted without following principles of natural justice.

¶16

1/3

¶17

wpst. 28553-19-nob.doc

¶18

In Writ Petition No. 10416 of 2019 we have granted ad-interim relief in favour of the petitioner therein.

¶19

In view of the above, we direct the respondents to fle reply before the returnable date.

¶20

Stand over to 5/12/2019.

¶21

Till next date there shall be an ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) which reads as follows : Prayer clause (c) in Writ Petition St. No.28553 of 2019

¶22

“(c) Pending the hearing and fnal disposal of this Writ Petition, the execution, operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 8-82019 [EXHIBIT “R” hereto] passed by the Respondent No.1 and impugned order dated 18-92019 [EXHIBIT “S” hereto] passed by the Respondent No.2 – Institution thereby reverting the Petition in the post of Temporary Clerk, may kindly be stayed and accordingly, the Petitioner be permitted to continue his services in the post of District Organization Commissioner / District Organizer.”

¶23

2/3

¶24

wpst. 28553-19-nob.doc

¶25

Prayer clause (c) in Writ Petition No.10876 of 2019

¶26

“(c) Pending the hearing and fnal disposal of this Writ Petition, the execution, operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 18-92019 [EXHIBIT “U” hereto] passed/issued by the Respondent No. 2- Institution thereby reverting the Petitioner in the post of Temporary Clerk, may kindly be stayed and accordingly, the Petitioner be permitted to continue her services in the post of District Organization Commissioner / District Organizer.”

¶27

These Petitions to be heard along with Writ Petition No. 10416 of 2019.

¶28

Meanwhile the Registry to issue notice to respondent No. 2.

¶29

(M.S.KARNIK, J.)

¶30

(RANJIT MORE, J.)

¶31

Digitally signed by Diksha Diksha RaneDate: Rane 2019.11.18 12:19:50 +0530

¶32

3/3

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire v. the State of Maharashtra through Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Anr.

Rajendra Bhanudas Mahire vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Anr.

Bhaskar Shripati Nagore and Ors. vs State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, through Its Registrar and Ors.

Mohan Prabhakar Bhide vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Mohan Prabhakar Bhide vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Mohan Prabhakar Bhide vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.