Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner despite multiple calls and no representation.
Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
25-WP-352-18.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.352 OF 2018
Vivekanand Shrirang Mane
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
SMT. S. S. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE :22/11/2019.
P.C.:
.Nobody for the petitioner even on second call. Learned APP
appears for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. We dismiss the petition for want of
prosecution.
(SMT. S. S. JADHAV, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Vivekanand Shrirang Mane
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dhar madhi k ar i
Smt. S. S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court