The High Court dismissed Criminal Application No. 91 of 2014 seeking restoration of a writ petition for want of prosecution, as the petitioner did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
35-APPW-91-14.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3595 OF 2013
Namo Arihantanam Shri Shankeshwar
Parshwanath
...Petitioner/Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner/Applicant.
Smt. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. S. S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE :22/11/2019.
P.C.:
.The matter has remained pending without any orders. Prayer is
to restore Writ Petition No.3595/2013 by condoning delay of 97 days. That
Writ Petition has been dismissed by the office for not removing office
objection on 15/10/2013.
2/Learned APP is present for the State. There is no appearance
for the petitioner. We therefore dismiss the application for want of
prosecution.
(SMT. S. S. JADHAV, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Namo Arihantanam Shri Shankeshwar Parshwanath
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
SMT. S. S. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court