Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition pending review. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition without expressing any opinion on the review petition's tenability.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 35.15wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 35 OF 2015
Shreeram s/o Sakharam Khandre..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Strate of Maharashtra & ors..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.R. Kolhare, Advocate for the petitioner;
Mr N.K. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent No.2;
Smt. Geeta L. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent/State;
Mr S.S. Thombre, Advocate for respondent No.4
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED :8th JULY, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
In view of the subsequent developments of post
filing of the petition, namely, filing of the review
petition, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner
prays for withdrawal of the petition.
2.The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and
disposed of accordingly.
3.We make it clear that this Court has not
expressed any opinion on the tenability of the review
petition to be filed by the petitioner and needless to
state that if such review petition is filed, the forum
before review petition is filed to consider the same on
its own merits.
Tupe
Shreeram s/o Sakharam Khandre
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court