This court disposed of a contempt petition after the learned A.G.P. recorded a communication dated 29.05.2019 showing compliance with a previous order releasing dues. Advouncing for petitioners conceded the grievance no longer survived following payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 762.18cp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 762 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.723 OF 2009
Pratap s/o Dinkar Sonawane,
Age: 51 years, Occ: Service,
R/o. Morane (P.L.),
Tq. & Dist. Dhule & ors
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors
RESPONDENTS
Mr Vijay A. Dhakne, Advocate for the petitioners;
Smt Geeta L. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED :8th JULY, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
On hearing learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioners, by order dated 26th October, 2018, simple
notice was issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 making the
same returnable after ten weeks and in response to the
notice, learned A.G.P. placed on record the communication
dated 29th May, 2019.
2.Perusal of the communication dated 29th May,
2019 show that in view of the order of this Court, amount
is released in favour of the petitioners against due and
payable amount towards scale of trained teachers subject
to certain conditions, namely, certain administrative
formalities.
3.Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners
admits that the communication/order dated 29th May, 2019
is a due compliance of the order of this Court and
grievance no more survives.
4.In view of this fact, the petition is disposed
of.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
Tupe
( 3 ) 762.18cp
Pratap s/o Dinkar Sonawane & ors
The State of Maharashtra & ors
Prasanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court