On instructions, the parties settled the dispute amicably. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal writ petition, which was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave was granted to withdraw the criminal writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-WP-3313-18.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3313 OF 2018
Rahul Eknath Nerkar
...Petitioner
Versus
Roshni Rahul Nerkar and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Prashant P. Raul for Petitioner. Mr. Abhijeet J. Kandarkar for Respondent No. 1. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2019
PER COURT:
[S.S. SHINDE, J.]
Bhagyawant
Rahul Eknath Nerkar
Roshni Rahul Nerkar
S. S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
