Application to re-cross-examine a witness based on record produced post-evidence. Held: Witness already cross-examined on relevant financial matters; prayer rejected to prevent prolonging proceedings.
Application allowing re-cross-examination rejected; Criminal Application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-apl-628-2018.doc
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 628 OF 2018
Mr.Karthikeyan Palmanickam
...Applicant
Versus
Smt.Meenakshi Karthikeyan
...Respondent
Mr.Nikhilesh Pote I/b. Mr.Sathyanarayanan for the Applicant. Mr.Shivanand Marbe i/b. Mr.Sushil Nimbkar for Respondent No.1. Mrs.Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER 2019
P.C.:
Trupti
20-apl-628-2018.doc
2/2
applicant may be given one opportunity to cross-examine the first respondent.
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Trupti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to a single opportunity to re-cross-examine the first respondent given new records submitted by the Bank Manager after her evidence was concluded.
Mr. Karthikeyan Palmanickam
Smt. Meenakshi Karthikeyan
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
