Dismissed
Nasim Jawad Khan v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/323/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
41.wp323.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 323 OF 2015
Mr. Nasim Jawa Khan. ...Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.
...Respondent.
None for petitioner.
Smt. Aruna S. Pai, APP for State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2019.
P.C.:
1 Nobody for petitioner. Learned APP states that though FIR initially mention section 304(2), 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, after investigation section 304A, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code are only surviving charges. She further states that trial may start soon.
2 As nobody appears, we dismiss present petition for want of prosecution.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J)
Talwalkar
Mr. Nasim Jawa Khan
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court