The High Court of Bombay disposed of an extraordinary writ petition regarding alleged high-handed recovery of a motor vehicle by a financial institute after a long delay without intervening.
Petition disposed of with liberty to take other steps open in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47.wp1602.17.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1602 OF 2017
Mohd. Akram Qureshi. ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Smt. S.D. Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2019.
P.C.:
1 Nobody for petitioner. Matter has remained pending without any orders since April, 2017.
2 Learned APP submits that respondent No. 3 financial institute is alleged to have taken possession of motor vehicle and sold it highhandedly.
3 It appears that for non receipt of their dues the possession of vehicle was taken by the respondent No. 3. In this situation, we are not inclined to intervene in extraordinary
Talwalkar
47.wp1602.17.doc
2
jurisdiction after more than 2 and half years. With liberty to
take such other steps as open in law, we dispose of petition.
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J)
Talwalkar
Mohd. Akram Qureshi
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SADHANA S. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
