Pritam Shailendra Singh and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Directors’ disqualification and vacation of office under the Companies Act 2013 were in issue. The court framed queries for Central Government instructions and deferred further orders, expressly declining to express even a prima facie interpretation or decide interim relief. All contentions remained open.
What the court decided
903-1052WP1224-18+.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1224 OF 2018
| Satish Kumar Gupta ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Anr ...Respondents |
|---|
| AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2018 |
| Dhiraj Manohar Kanoria ...Petitioner Versus |
| Union of India & Anr ...Respondents |
| AND WRIT PETITION NO. 1812 OF 2018 |
| Sanwar Kanoria Manohar ...Petitioner Versus |
| Union of India & Anr ...Respondents |
| AND |
| WRIT PETITION NO. 1830 OF 2018 |
| Shakuntala Laxminarayan Rathi & Laxminarayan Jainarayan Rathi ...Petitioner Versus |
| Union of India & Anr ...Respondents |
| AND |
WRIT PETITION NO. 1849 OF 2018
Page 1 of 45 15th October 2019
903-1052WP1224-18+.DOC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satish Kumar Gupta
- respondent
Union of India
- petitioner
Dhiraj Manohar Kanoria
- petitioner
Sanwar Kanoria Manohar
- petitioner
Shakuntala Laxminarayan Rathi
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court