In a writ petition and connected civil application regarding bank recovery, the tribunal directed petitioners to approach the bank for a one-time settlement proposal within two weeks.
Petitioners directed to apply for one-time settlement within 2 weeks; ad-interim relief continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 9902 OF 2016 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 22233 OF 2016
M/s.Aditi Automobiles and anr. .. Petitioners Vs.
The Greater Bombay Co operative Bank Ltd. And ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3909 OF 2016
Sou. Sumedha Sanjay Joshi .. Petitioner Vs. The Greater Bombay Co operative Bank Ltd. and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Sachin Dhakephalkar in WPST/9902/2016 &WP/3909/2016, for the Petitioners. Mr.Sameer Ramesh Bhalekar, for Respondent No.1 in WPST/9902/2016 & WP/3909/2016 and for Applicant in CAWST/22233/2016. Mr.C.D.Mali, AGP for State.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : 07th MARCH, 2019
P.C. :
. After hearing the matter for some time, learned
1/2
Counsel for the respondentBank suggested that the petitioners may apply to the respondent – Bank for one time settlement. He further assures that if such an application is made, an endeavour would be made to arrive at a final settlement.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
2/2
M/s. Aditi Automobiles and anr.
Sou. Sumedha Sanjay Joshi
The Greater Bombay Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ors.
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
