Disposed
Dinesh S. Shah and 6 Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/1858/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
918-WPG-1858.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1858 OF 2017
Dinesh S. Shah & Others .... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .... Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION {L} NO.63 OF 2019 {Not on Board}
Taraben Harekchand Shah .... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .... Respondents
Mr. Amarendra Mishra for the Petitioners. Ms Vandana Mahadik for the Respondent-MCGM. Mr. Y.V. Sanglikar for Respondent No.2.
P.C:
and we were disinclined to grant any relief in writ jurisdiction so
Page 1 of 2
suresh 918-WPG-1858.2017.doc
also to continue the ad-interim order dated 15-3-2017, passed in Writ Petition No.1858 of 2017, on instructions, Mr. Mishra, counsel for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to pursue the claims against the Life Insurance Corporation of India in appropriate proceedings. Leave is granted. The writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed. No costs.
(G.S. PATEL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Dinesh S. Shah & Others
Taraben Harekchand Shah
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
G.S. PATEL
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court