Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted and the petition was disposed of on the request of the learned Advocate for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
501-OSWP426-19.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 426 OF 2019
M-Tech Innovations Ltd...Petitioner
Versus
State Bank of India & Ors...Respondents
...Respondents
Mr Ashwin Shete, with Rehmat Lokhandwala, i/b Jayakar &
Partners, for the Petitioner.
Ms Namita Shetty, i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, for Respondent
No. 4.
Mr Vedchetan Patil, i/b Pancham Surana, for Respondent No. 6.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ
DATED:8th July 2019
PC:-
1. At the request of the learned Advocate for the petitioner and in terms of the instructions received, leave to withdraw the writ petition is granted. The writ petition is disposed of.
(S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J)
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 1 of 1
8th July 2019
M-Tech Innovations Ltd
State Bank of India & Ors
S. C. Dharmadhikari
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court