Two writ petitions regarding inter-se rights in a vacated building were disposed of by the High Court of Bombay upon the facts that all occupants had vacated the premises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-WP.1841.2019+1.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1841 OF 2019
Ambalal Dave } Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of } Greater Mumbai and Ors. } Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 333 OF 2019
Vrajesh Mulshankar Dave } Petitioner versus Municipal Corporation of } Greater Mumbai and Ors. } Respondents
Mr.Nikhli Mishra i/b. M/s.Mahimtura and Co. for the petitioner in WP/1841/2019.
Ms.Panthi Desai i/b. M/s.M.P.Vashi Associates for the petitioner in WPL/333/2019.
Mr.S.J.Bhambhlani with Ms.Rupal Adhate for the Municipal Corporation.
Mr.Rashmin Khandekar with Ms.Swati Sawant and Ms.Gauri Joshi i/b. M/s.S.K.Legal Associates LLP for respondent no.4 in WP/1841/2019 and for respondent no.3 in WPL/333/2019.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED :- AUGUST 27, 2019
P.C. :-
In terms of the earlier order and on account of the fact that
the building has been vacated by all the occupants, by keeping
Page 1 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
910-WP.1841.2019+1.doc
open the issues relating to their inter-se rights, we dispose of these writ petitions. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.
(G.S.PATEL, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.SALUNKE,PS
Ambalal Dave
Vrajesh Mulshankar Dave
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
