Court held that the writ petition fell within the jurisdiction of the Aurangabad Bench and directed the petitioner to re-present the petition to that Bench.
Petitioner directed to take back and re-present the petition to the Aurangabad Bench. Registry to act accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-WP-9381.2019.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9381 OF 2019
Kum. Dipali D/o Devrao Tiparse .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Anil S. Golegaonkar for the Petitioner. Ms R.A. Salunkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 26, 2019
P.C:
(G.S. PATEL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Kum. Dipali D/o Devrao Tiparse
The State of Maharashtra
G.S. PATEL
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
