Disposed

Supriya Babanrao Totawar Under Guardian Babanrao Govindrao Totawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC15 Feb 2019WP/1700/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerned the delay in deciding an application for a scheduled tribe caste certificate submitted by the petitioner. The High Court directed the Sub Divisional Officer to decide the application and issue the certificate expeditiously if formalities were met.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondent No.1 to decide the application submitted on 15th November, 2018 expeditiously and issue certificate if formalities complied.

Supriya Babanrao Totawar Under Guardian… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

(1)

¶2

1700.19wp

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1700 OF 2019

¶5

Supriya d/o Babarao Totawar,
Age: Minor, Occ: Education,
under guardian of Babarao Govindrao
Totawar, Age: Major, Occ: Agri.,
R/o. Pendpalli, Tq. Degloor,
Dist. Nanded...PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

1.The State of Maharashtra
Through Sub Divisional Officer/
Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Degloor,Tq. Degloor,
Dist. Nanded.

¶8

2.Scheduled Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee Division
Aurangabad...RESPONDENTS

¶9

Mr P.B. Rakhunde, Advocate for petitioner;
Ms R.P. Gour, A.G.P. for respondent/State

¶10

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE

¶11

AND

¶12

 S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
 DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2019

¶13

ORAL ORDER :

¶14

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the

¶15

petitioner.

¶16

1700.19wp (2)

¶17

2.As limited grievance is raised in the

¶18

petition, the petition is taken up for disposal at
admission stage.

¶19

3.The petitioner is a student and approached
this Court by way of present petition through his
natural guardian father Babarao Govindrao Totawar.
Certain documents are placed on record to submit
that the petitioner belongs to 'Koli Mahadev,
scheduled tribe' and as the petitioner was desirous
of seeking caste certificate, the petitioner
approached the office of Sub Divisional Officer by
submitting the application in proper format. The
application also accepted by the office of Sub
Divisional Officer. Copy of the same is placed at
page-26.

¶20

4.Learned Counsel for the petitioner

¶21

submitted that the documents clearly show that the
petitioner along with the application submitted
various documents in support of his claim is
accepted by the office of Sub Divisional Officer on

¶22

1700.19wp (3)

¶23

15th November, 2018 till date, no decision on the
application and in turn, the petitioner is not in
receipt of issuance of certificate till date.

¶24

5.This being limited grievance, the petition
is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1 -
Sub Divisional Officer, Degloor, Tq. Degloor, Dist.
Nanded to decide the application submitted to him
on 15th November, 2018 as expeditiously as possible

¶25

and if the petitioner complied with all
formalities, to issue caste certificate to the
petitioner expeditiously.

¶26

6.With these directions, the petition is

¶27

disposed of.

¶28

( S.M.GAVHANE )(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGE JUDGE

¶29

Tupe

Supriya Babanrao Totawar Under Guardian Babanrao Govindrao Totawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Supriya Babanrao Totawar Under Guardian Babanrao Govindrao Totawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Babanrao Rao and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pathan Musaveer Khan Baktiyar Khan Vs Maharashtra University of Health Science Nashik Though Registrar and Others

Dushyant Harishchandra Mate Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through Its Chief Area Manager and Another

Sushma Rajesh Junagade and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Chandrashekhar Pandurang Holkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shivam Ramlu Bukkawar through Ramlu Shankarrao Bukkawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another