This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
ca2743.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2743 OF 2019
IN WP/15326/2017
DUSHYANT HARISHCHANDRA MATE VERSUS
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD THROUGH ITS CHIEF AREA MANAGER AND ANOTHER
Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. A.P.Bhandari, Advocate for the respondents
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :14.02.2019
P.C. :-
1.Heard Mr. Gaware, learned counsel for the
applicant/petitioner and Mr. Bhandari, learned counsel
for the respondents.
2.By the present application the applicant though
prays for quashment of the notice issued on 11.02.2019
in the newspaper thereby the redraw is scheduled on
15.02.2019 and though ad-interim prayer is also made in
the application, learned counsel Mr.Bhandari, appearing
for the respondent/Corporation submitted before us that
any hinderence in the schedule of redraw may lead to
delay in selection process and he submitted before this
Court that if the respondent-Corporation is permitted to
go on with the schedule of redraw subject to final
outcome of the petition filed by the petitioner in this
Court, mo prejudice would be caused either to the
1/ 2
( 2 ) ca2743.19
applicant/petitioner or the respondent. He also submits
that the Corporation will also intimate the interested
parties participating in the schedule of redraw about
the pendency of the petition.
3.We find the statement of Mr. Bhandari, learned
counsel a fair statement and Mr.Bhandari was justified
in submitting that let the process go on subject to
final out come of the parties. As such the interest of
the petitioner and respondent-Corporation is protected.
In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the
petitioner, we see no reason to pass any order on the
application. The application is accordingly disposed of.
4.Learned counsel for the respective parties
submits that the exercise of pleading is complete and
the petition is ready for hearing.
5.Accordingly post the writ petition No.15326 of
2017 on 04.03.2019 for further consideration. The
parties are put on notice that if it is convenient to
this Court the petition may be heard finally at the
stage of admission.
6.Parties to act upon authenticated copy this
order.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
ssp/Feb.19/ ca2743.19
2/ 2
DUSHYANT HARISHCHANDRA MATE
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
PRASANNA B. VARALE
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court